Abomination or merely cause for eye-bleaching?
I'm chortling to myself, trying to imagine Peacebang's commentary on these outfits, over at Beauty Tips For Ministers.
Dress up for church!, she exhorts...
(Readers, please note that the management is not responsible for any mental injury, nightmares, and loss of taste incurred)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I think it's beautiful art! And remember, everyone: "Dress up for church" is my message to CLERGY. So don't yell at me, it's too early.
But seriously: all high-concept fashion isn't to be taken seriously as something you or I would actually wear. It's meant to provoke interest and invoke an aesthetic that will translate in real person's terms as a tiny adjustment to our hemlines, collars, shoe style, etc.
Thanks for the fun!
Yell? At a minister? At Peacebang?
Egads, never.
And it wasn't early, it was late. But you'd apparently stomped off to watch "The Departed."
Hmphf.
I've sacrificed my eyes again, just to be sure. I can't imagine the tiny adjustment here. You're talking, I suppose, about the application of the Overton window concept to fashion. But the trainwreck between a bad poodle cut in knit and tummy support underwear... it's unimaginable (ok, no... I just really don't want to imagine where that might erupt into teenybopper fashion sensibilities. I remain confident that Peacebang would be tutting about wearing something like that (clergy or not) to church. Don't disabuse me--we mythical beings have to maintain our fantasies).
It was...uh...interesting....
Post a Comment